|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the customer review section someone posted a message about problems with spam. GatorJoshi posted some suggestions, including information about BoxTrapper.
For those who don't know, BoxTrapper uses the challenge-response method to reduce spam. It has a whitelist of email accounts that are approved. When you get email from an account that's not on the whitelist BoxTrapper puts the email in a queue and sends what is known as a challenge message to the sender. If the sender responds correctly to the challenge, then the sender is added to the whitelist and any queued messages from that sender are released. While challenge-response is controversial, I think it is appropriate in some circumstances. However, I find the BoxTrapper application lacking in a couple of ways. In subsequent posts I'm going to explain the problems I have with BoxTrapper, because maybe the problems result simply from a lack of understanding that others here can set right. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The first problem I have with BoxTrapper is that the default verify message is not very user friendly. If you edit that message you see this:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
One little problem with the verify message I've posted above is that %acct% will be replaced with the email address for final delivery. This interacts badly with email forwards, as the following example illustrates.
Suppose you have BoxTrapper enabled and set up with my verify message for yourname@yourdomain.com. You also have sales@yourdomain.com forwarded to yourname@yourdomain.com. If someone sends an email to sales@mydomain.com they are going to get a challenge message that tells them they sent email to yourname@yourdomain.com -- only they didn't. So I suppose this is why the default verify message appends the headers. But even then, before the sender sees those headers (which they may or may not understand), they will see a message from yourname@yourdomain.com -- even though they sent a message to sales@yourdomain.com. You can avoid this, of course, by making sure you don't forward other addresses to an address that is protected by BoxTrapper. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What I'd really like, though, is to be able to append the senders original message to the challenge message. This is way easy for most people to understand -- and this is the way TMDA (an open source app) does it. With TDMA, you can have a verify message like this:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The final problem I have with BoxTrapper is that the only way I can find to review the message queue is via the cPanel.
If I am the domain admin for a small business and I've set up email accounts for 10 people, I don't want to give those 10 people cPanel access. I also don't want to be reviewing the BoxTrapper queue for the email accounts of those 10 people. TMDA can be set up so that the end users of email accounts can check their own queue, manually release messages (and thereby automatically whitelist the sender), and even directly modify their own whitelist. I guess the bottom line is that I wish HG would install TMDA. It's open-source and well-documented. (Of course, if I had a dedi...) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.








