Dedicated servers SOLD OUT

[esl]

Originally Posted by chaloupe

That was fast!

Good too know they sold pretty fast.

Yea, it was!

[kmaw]

Maybe they didn't have too many and there were just a few to get them by..

[YukonMaster]

Originally Posted by kmaw

Maybe they didn't have too many and there were just a few to get them by..

If thats true, maybe the old server specs will be back?

Or is that wishful thinking?

[ghpk]

Originally Posted by YukonMaster

If thats true, maybe the old server specs will be back?

Or is that wishful thinking?

I'll pray y/our wish comes true.

[gtgeorge]

Originally Posted by ghpk

I'll pray y/our wish comes true.

We are all joining in prayer that the craziness of the shared and reseller package allocations spill over into the dedicated servers area.

[ghpk]

PRO SERVER IS Available now. and good see its with 4GB RAM currently.

lets see if elite and standard ones gets back with some more.....

[codesight]

Still hope the put the 2x80 in the standard package again!

Well, at least before I need one.

[ghpk]

Originally Posted by codesight

Still hope the put the 2x80 in the standard package again!

Well, at least before I need one.

thats what many of users are waiting for IMHO

[codesight]

Originally Posted by ghpk

thats what many of users are waiting for IMHO

it only makes sense as HG doesn't do any backups for dedicated servers... sure you can ftp it to another server somewhere... but that just seems lame, with the added HD, you can just save it to the other HD, the standard HAD this before the server "upgrades", sure the disk space went up on the standard, but the functionality went backwards

[ghpk]

Originally Posted by codesight

it only makes sense as HG doesn't do any backups for dedicated servers... sure you can ftp it to another server somewhere... but that just seems lame, with the added HD, you can just save it to the other HD, the standard HAD this before the server "upgrades", sure the disk space went up on the standard, but the functionality went backwards

yups, and it would be painful to do the backup drill every week, and would take ages to upload if you had an issue which needed restore.

Currently the additional cost(monthly or one time) would be a pinch atleast for me.

[slapshotw]

Realistically you should be doing BOTH an on-site backup to a second drive, and an off-site backup to a completely different location. You can get off-site backup only packages for very cheap from some a bunch of reliable providers. There's a very long thread on it in the forums here.

[ghpk]

Originally Posted by slapshotw

Realistically you should be doing BOTH an on-site backup to a second drive, and an off-site backup to a completely different location. You can get off-site backup only packages for very cheap from some a bunch of reliable providers. There's a very long thread on it in the forums here.

ya, iam already using that.

thanks for your suggestions, but if you look on those threads, i already say offsite is a must and been using it for 3 yrs. now.

thanks for your time anyway.

[slapshotw]

Originally Posted by ghpk

if you look on those threads, i already say offsite is a must

Codesight said this:

Originally Posted by codesight

sure you can ftp it to another server somewhere... but that just seems lame

And then you said this:

Originally Posted by ghpk

and it would be painful to do the backup drill every week

So I do think that for people reading this thread, it was necessary to say that both an on-site and an off-site are important. If you've been doing it for three years, well, you've been doing the right thing for three years. But not everybody has.

[ghpk]

Originally Posted by slapshotw

well, you've been doing the right thing for three years. But not everybody has.

yes I agree, your post will certainly help the others reading the thread.